Contents
Get a Personalized Demo
See how Torq harnesses AI in your SOC to detect, prioritize, and respond to threats faster.
The promise of the “AI SOC” is everywhere. Every vendor is pitching a future where security operations are self-driving, autonomous, and effortless.
But for the CISOs and engineers actually doing the work, the reality feels different. The gap between the marketing hype and a functioning production environment is filled with technical roadblocks, integration nightmares, and operational friction. Most AI SOC initiatives stall not because AI is ineffective, but because integration complexity, trust boundaries, and operational friction are underestimated.
If you are struggling to modernize your operations, you aren’t alone. These AI SOC challenges are real — but they aren’t insurmountable. The difference between failure and success lies in the platform you choose to navigate them.
Here is a transparent look at the most challenging aspects of building an AI SOC, and how Torq removes the obstacles to make the path forward easier.
7 AI SOC Challenges Holding Teams Back
Challenge 1: Data Integration Complexity
SOC teams rely on dozens of tools across SIEM, EDR, identity, cloud, email, and ITSM. Each produces valuable signals, but those signals live in separate systems with different APIs, schemas, and workflows.
The reality:
- Disparate tools with inconsistent log formats
- Legacy SIEMs that don’t integrate with modern platforms
- Shadow IT and undocumented data sources
- API limitations and rate throttling that bottleneck automation
According to Splunk’s State of Security 2025 report, 78% of organizations are fighting with dispersed, disconnected tools. Every investigation requires manual pivoting between consoles.
How to overcome it:
- Prioritize platforms with broad prebuilt integrations
- Start with your core stack and expand incrementally
- Audit data sources before automation projects begin
- Accept that integration is ongoing, not a one-time project
Challenge 2: Playbook Design and Maintenance
Legacy SOAR promised automation through playbooks. What it delivered was technical debt. Legacy SOAR automation relies heavily on deterministic, script-based logic. As environments evolve, these workflows degrade.
The reality:
- Building reliable, adaptable workflows is resource-intensive
- Static playbooks break when environments change
- Edge cases multiply faster than teams can document them
- Maintenance burden grows with every new automation
Teams that invested months building SOAR playbooks often spend more time fixing them than benefiting from them. One vendor update, one environment change, one edge case nobody anticipated — and the whole workflow breaks.
How to overcome it:
Challenge 3: Trust and Risk Tolerance in Automation
The hardest question isn’t “can AI act?” — it’s “when should it act?”
The reality:
- Analysts resist letting automation act autonomously
- One bad automated action erodes months of trust-building
- Risk tolerance varies dramatically by organization and use case
- Security teams have been burned by automation failures before
The trust gap is real. Black-box AI decisions make it worse. When analysts can’t see why an automation took an action, they don’t trust it — and they shouldn’t. Without trust, teams keep humans in the loop for everything. “Autonomous” becomes “automation with extra approval steps.” The efficiency gains disappear.
How to overcome it:
- Demand explainable AI with transparent reasoning and audit trails for every decision
- Build confidence with clear guardrails and approval thresholds
- Gradual expansion of autonomy based on observed accuracy
Challenge 4: Limited Context Across Environments
Most security incidents are cross-domain, but most tools are not.
Email, endpoint, identity, SaaS, and cloud telemetry often live in separate silos. AI that only sees one domain is forced to guess.
The reality:
- Cloud, endpoint, identity, and SaaS data live in silos
- Correlating context across environments requires deep integration
- Multi-cloud and hybrid architectures multiply complexity
- Real-time correlation at scale is technically difficult
AI without context makes bad decisions. A suspicious login looks different when you know the user’s endpoint just flagged malware. An anomalous data transfer makes sense when correlated with a legitimate business process.
When AI can’t see the full picture, analysts end up doing manual correlation anyway — defeating the purpose of automation.
How to overcome it:
- Prioritize platforms designed for cross-tool querying
- Implement multi-agent systems that query multiple sources simultaneously
- Build correlation logic that adapts to your specific environment
- Build incremental expansion of context coverage
Challenge 5: Skill Gaps in SecOps Teams
Most SOC analysts were hired to analyze threats, not engineer automation. That mismatch creates real AI SOC challenges.
The reality:
- Automation fluency is different from security expertise
- Vendors assume technical capabilities that don’t exist
- Turnover means institutional knowledge walks out the door
- Poor implementation leads to poor results
Teams that lack automation skills not only struggle with implementation but also with ongoing optimization. Projects stall waiting for “the one person who knows how it works.” When that person leaves, the automation becomes a black box nobody wants to touch.
How to overcome it:
- Choose no-code/low-code platforms that don’t require programming expertise
- Invest in training before implementation, not after
- Build automations collaboratively with analysts and engineers
Challenge 6: Organizational Resistance
Perception plays a critical role in the success or failure of AI SOC initiatives.. Fear of job displacement, skepticism from prior failures, and cross-team friction can stall adoption.
The reality:
- Fear of job replacement creates internal opposition
- Leadership skepticism after previous failed projects
- “We’ve always done it this way,” mindset
Analysts who feel threatened become blockers, not champions. This is the AI SOC challenge that catches technical teams off guard. You can solve every integration problem and still fail because nobody wants to use what you built.
How to overcome it:
- Frame AI (accurately!) as augmentation, not replacement
- Involve analysts in design decisions from day one
- Demonstrate quick wins to build momentum and credibility
- Tie automation outcomes to team KPIs, not headcount reduction
Challenge 7: Vendor Lock-In and Siloed Systems
Centralization is not the same as autonomy. Some platforms require full data ingestion into proprietary data lakes to unlock AI capabilities. This limits flexibility and increases switching costs.
The reality:
- Proprietary platforms create dependency
- Closed ecosystems limit integration options
- Migration costs make switching prohibitively expensive
- Vendor roadmaps don’t align with your needs
Achieving autonomy through a locked-in vendor isn’t autonomy; it’s trading one constraint for another. Autonomy should increase freedom — not reduce it.
How to overcome it:
- Prioritize vendor-agnostic, API-first platforms
- Evaluate the total cost of ownership, including exit costs
- Demand portability of workflows and integrations
- Choose partners
How Torq Helps Teams Address AI SOC Challenges
We built Torq because we lived through these AI SOC challenges ourselves. We knew that for AI to work in the enterprise, it didn’t just need to be smart; it needed to be accessible.
Here is how Torq’s AI SOC eliminates the friction and makes the transition to autonomy easy.
Open, Stack-Agnostic Integration
We don’t care what tools you use. Our platform is built on an open, API-first architecture with limitless integrations.
You don’t need to build custom connectors or normalize data manually. Torq connects to your existing stack — Wiz, Okta, CrowdStrike, Slack — instantly. To build the full picture, our AI Agents can query any tool in your arsenal that you authorize, automatically bridging the data gaps that stall other platforms.
Transparent, Policy-Bound Autonomy
With Torq, you see exactly what the AI is thinking. Our AI SOC Analyst, Socrates, shows its work. You get a full, human-readable timeline of every step the AI took: I checked the IP reputation, I verified the user in Okta, I saw no previous logins from this country.
Every AI-driven action in Torq is explainable, logged, and auditable. Teams control when automation analyzes, recommends, or executes — and can adjust that boundary over time.
Solve Complexity with No-Code + Agentic AI
Torq combines the power of agentic AI with a no-code interface.
- Agentic AI: Handles the complex “thinking” tasks (investigation, decision making, conversational triage with users).
- No-code builder: Allows your team to visually drag-and-drop the workflows and guardrails.
This combination means you can deploy adaptive, AI-enhanced workflows in minutes, not months.
Maintenance with AI Workflows
Legacy automation breaks constantly. Torq is built to adapt. Torq workflows are intent-driven, not hard coded scripts, making them more tolerant of API changes and minor data shifts.
The Bottom Line
AI SOC challenges are real. But the challenges are surmountable. Organizations that approach AI SOC implementation with realistic expectations, the right platform, and genuine organizational alignment achieve transformative results: 95%+ automation, 60%+ MTTR reduction, and analysts doing strategic work instead of drowning in alerts.
The Torq platform was built with these challenges in mind. 300+ prebuilt integrations for the data complexity problem. Adaptive reasoning instead of brittle playbooks. Explainable AI with full audit trails. 90-day time-to-value, not 12-month implementations.
It’s possible — and we’ll show you how.
FAQs
The biggest AI SOC challenges are data fragmentation (tools not communicating with each other), a lack of trust in AI decision-making (fear of errors or unintended consequences), and the high technical barrier to entry (requiring coding skills). Torq addresses all three by offering extensive integrations, transparent AI reasoning, and a no-code interface.
Torq solves integration challenges by using an agentless, API-first approach. Unlike platforms that require you to move all your data into their proprietary data lake, Torq overlays your existing stack, orchestrating actions across any tool (SIEM, EDR, Cloud, Identity) without complex setup.
Yes, but only if the platform provides transparency and guardrails. One of the main AI SOC challenges is the “black box” problem. Torq addresses this by ensuring that every AI decision is logged, auditable, and visible to human analysts, and by enabling teams to establish strict policy guardrails on what the AI is permitted to do.
Sometimes. But AI SOC platforms like Torq make the path easy. By removing the need for custom code and offering pre-built AI Agents, Torq enables organizations to transition from “zero” to “autonomous value” in days, rather than the 6-12 month cycles typical of legacy SOAR solutions.
With true AI SOC platforms, organizations can see a measurable impact within 30 days and achieve significant automation coverage within 90 days. However, full autonomy is a journey — most organizations benefit from incremental expansion over 6 to 12 months.
Prioritize platforms with broad prebuilt integrations (300+), adaptive reasoning instead of static playbooks, explainable AI with full audit trails, vendor-agnostic architecture, and proven time-to-value. Look for 90-day ROI, not 12-month implementations.
